Part C - General Provisions

40 USC Appendix 221 - Maintenance of effort

No State and no political subdivision of such State shall be eligible to receive benefits under this Act unless the aggregate expenditures of State funds, exclusive of expenditures for participation in the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways, and exclusive of local funds and Federal funds, for the benefit of the area within the State located in the region are maintained at a level which does not fall below the average level of such expenditures for its last two full fiscal years preceding the date of enactment of this Act. In computing the average level of expenditure for its last two fiscal years, a States past expenditure for participation in the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways and expenditures of local funds and Federal funds shall not be included. The Commission shall recommend to the President or such Federal officer or officers as the President may designate, a lesser requirement when it finds that a substantial population decrease in that portion of a State which lies within the region would not justify a State expenditure equal to the average level of the last two years or when it finds that a States average level of expenditure, within an individual program, has been disproportionate to the present need for that portion of the State which lies within the region.

40 USC Appendix 222 - Consent of States

Nothing contained in this Act shall be interpreted as requiring any State to engage in or accept any program under this Act without its consent.

40 USC Appendix 223 - Program implementation

No program or project authorized under any section of this title shall be implemented until
(1)  applications and plans relating to the program or project have been determined by the responsible Federal official to be not incompatible with the provisions and objectives of Federal laws which he administers that are not inconsistent with this Act, and
(2)  the Commission has approved such program or project and has determined that it meets the applicable criteria under section 224 of this Act and the requirements of the development planning process under section 225, and will contribute to the development of the region, which determination shall be controlling and which shall be accepted by the Federal agencies.

40 USC Appendix 224 - Program development criteria

(a) In considering programs and projects to be given assistance under this Act, and in establishing a priority ranking of the requests for assistance presented to the Commission, the Commission shall follow procedures that will insure consideration of the following factors:
(1) the relationship of the project or class of projects to overall regional development including its location in an area determined by the State have a significant potential for growth or in a severely and persistently distressed county or area;
(2) the population and area to be served by the project or class of projects including the relative per capita income and the unemployment rates in the area;
(3) the relative financial resources available to the State or political subdivisions or instrumentalities thereof which seek to undertake the project;
(4) the importance of the project or class of projects in relation to other projects or classes of projects which may be in competition for the same funds;
(5) the prospects that the project for which assistance is sought will improve, on a continuing rather than a temporary basis, the opportunities for employment, the average level of income, or the economic and social development of the area served by the project; and
(6) the extent to which the project design provides for detailed outcome measurements by which grant expenditures may be evaluated.
(b) Limitation.— 
Financial assistance made available under this Act shall not be used to assist establishments relocating from one area to another.
(c) Funds may be provided for programs and projects in a State under this Act only if the Commission determines that the level of Federal and State financial assistance under Acts other than this Act for the same type of programs or projects in that portion of the State within the region, will not be diminished in order to substitute funds authorized by this Act.

40 USC Appendix 225 - Appalachian State development planning process

(a) Pursuant to policies established by the Commission, each State member shall submit on such schedule as the Commission shall prescribe a development plan for the area of the State within the region. The State development plan shall reflect the goals, objectives, and priorities identified in the regional development plan and in any subregional development plan which may be approved for the subregion of which such State is a part. Such State development plan shall
(1)  describe the State organization and continuous process for Appalachian development planning, including the procedures established by the State for the participation of local development districts in such process, the means by which such process is related to overall statewide planning and budgeting processes, and the method of coordinating planning and projects in the region under this Act, the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, and other Federal, State, and local programs;
(2)  set forth the goals, objectives, and priorities of the State for the region, as determined by the Governor, and identify the needs on which such goals, objectives, and priorities are based; and
(3)  describe the development program for achieving such goals, objectives, and priorities, including funding sources, and recommendations for specific projects to receive assistance under this Act.
(b) 
(1) Local development districts certified by the State under section 301 of this Act provide the linkage between State and substate planning and development. In carrying out the development planning process, including the selection of programs and projects for assistance, States shall consult with local development districts, local units of government, and citizen groups and take into consideration the goals, objectives, priorities, and recommendations of such bodies. The districts shall assist the States in the coordination of areawide programs and projects, and may prepare and adopt areawide plans or action programs.
(2) The Commission shall encourage the preparation and execution of areawide action programs which specify interrelated projects and schedules of actions together with the necessary agency fundings and other commitments to implement such programs. Such programs shall make appropriate use of existing plans affecting the area.
(c) To the maximum extent practicable, Federal departments, agencies, and instrumentalities undertaking or providing financial assistance for programs or projects in the region shall
(1)  take into account the policies, goals, and objectives established by the Commission and its member States pursuant to this Act;
(2)  recognize Appalachian State development programs approved by the Commission as satisfying requirements for overall economic development planning under such programs or projects; and
(3)  accept the boundaries and organization of any local development district certified under this Act which the Governor may designate as the areawide agency required under any such program undertaken or assisted by such Federal departments, agencies, and instrumentalities.

40 USC Appendix 226 - Distressed and economically strong counties

(a) Designations.— 

(1) In general.— 
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Commission, in accordance with such criteria as the Commission may establish, shall
(A) designate as distressed counties those counties in the region that are the most severely and persistently distressed; and
(B) designate 2 categories of economically strong counties, consisting of
(i) competitive counties, which shall be those counties in the region that are approaching economic parity with the rest of the United States; and
(ii) attainment counties, which shall be those counties in the region that have attained or exceeded economic parity with the rest of the United States.
(2) Annual review of designations.— 
The Commission shall
(A) conduct an annual review of each designation of a county under paragraph (1) to determine if the county still meets the criteria for the designation; and
(B) renew the designation for another 1-year period only if the county still meets the criteria.
(b) Distressed Counties.— 
In program and project development and implementation and in the allocation of appropriations made available to carry out this Act, the Commission shall give special consideration to the needs of those counties for which a distressed county designation is in effect under this section.
(c) Economically Strong Counties.— 

(1) Competitive counties.— 
Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), in the case of a project that is carried out in a county for which a competitive county designation is in effect under this section, assistance under this Act shall be limited to not more than 30 percent of the project cost.
(2) Attainment counties.— 
Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), no funds may be provided under this Act for a project that is carried out in a county for which an attainment county designation is in effect under this section.
(3) Exceptions.— 
The requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply to
(A) any project on the Appalachian development highway system authorized by section 201;
(B) any local development district administrative project assisted under section 302 (a)(1); or
(C) any multicounty project that is carried out in 2 or more counties designated under this section if
(i) at least 1 of the participating counties is designated as a distressed county under this section; and
(ii) the project will be of substantial direct benefit to 1 or more distressed counties.
(4) Waiver.— 

(A) In general.— 
The Commission may waive the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) for a project upon a showing by the recipient of assistance for the project of 1 or more of the following:
(i) The existence of a significant pocket of distress in the part of the county in which the project is carried out.
(ii) The existence of a significant potential benefit from the project in 1 or more areas of the region outside the designated county.
(B) Reports to congress.— 
The Commission shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives an annual report describing each waiver granted under subparagraph (A) during the period covered by the report.