977 F.2d 593
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hugo NAVEJAR-MLADOSICH, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-50043.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 8, 1992.*
Decided Oct. 13, 1992.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
United States v. Proa-Tovar, No. 90-50373, slip op. 11085 (9th Cir. Sept. 14, 1992) (en banc), controls this case. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with Proa-Tovar.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.