95 F.3d 1158
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles BLUE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-50086.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 23, 1996.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Charles Blue appeals his conviction for conspiracy, criminal forfeiture, and obstruction of justice. We affirm.
Blue contends that his criminal prosecution violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because he had already been prosecuted and punished for the same conduct through prior administrative forfeiture proceedings. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Ursery, 116 S.Ct. 2135 (1996).
AFFIRMED.