902 F2d 1579 Osborne v. Clark

902 F.2d 1579

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Mary E. OSBORNE; Everett E. Osborne, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
Sue CLARK, Superintendent, Purdy Treatment Center for Women;
Lawrence Kincheloe, Warden, Washington State
Penitentiary, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-35236.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 11, 1990.*
Decided May 16, 1990.

Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

1

ORDER**

2

Upon due consideration, the dismissal of the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the unpublished memorandum opinion of the district court.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

This panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3