900 F2d 262 Iinuma Smith v. Iinuma

900 F.2d 262

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

In re Jane IINUMA, aka Jane Akiko Iinuma, Debtor,
Robert SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jane IINUMA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-15172.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 1990.*
Decided April 17, 1990.

Before FARRIS, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Smith appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's disallowance of his claim for attorneys' fees. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order of January 19, 1989, affirming the bankruptcy court.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3