886 F.2d 1319
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
William BISER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis SULLIVAN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 88-3933.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 1989.*
Decided Sept. 27, 1989.
Before PREGERSON, TROTT and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
William Biser appeals a district court decision upholding an Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") determination that Biser was not disabled under the Social Security Act.
It is unnecessary to recite the facts of the case or review the contentions on appeal, as they are familiar to the parties. This court is satisfied, based on the record, that the findings of the ALJ and the Secretary of Health & Human Services set forth specific, legitimate reasons supported by substantial evidence in making the determination that Biser was not disabled and that he could engage in substantial, gainful activity. See Sprague v. Bowen, 812 F.2d 1226, 1230 (9th Cir.1987); Murray v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 499, 502 (9th Cir.1983).
The district court did not err in affirming the determination of the defendant, and the district court's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.