842 F.2d 1289
Unpublished Disposition
Martin John CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent-Appellee.
Martin John CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 87-6622, 87-7193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 1987.
Decided March 3, 1988.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Martin John Cunningham, appellant pro se.
Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals from its orders refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Cunningham v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 86-3535-B (D.Md. Aug. 24, 1987) and Cunningham v. Warden, C/A No. 86-159-B (D.Md. May 21, 1987).
DISMISSED.