tOO!

82

Il'JCl>JCRAL REPORTll:lL.

Court ot the United States tor the Eastern District ot Mlssonrl.· 1. M. Holm., tor appellant. George W. LUbke, tor appellee. Dismissed per stipulation, & mandate and attorney's tee tor appellee being waived. See 79 Fed. 87. NORTHERN P AO·. RY. CO. v. DUDLEY et al. (Olrcult Court ot Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 19, 1897.) No. 31)4. Appeal trom the Circuit Court ottheUnlted States tor the Northern Division ot the District ot Idaho. Dudley,Bunn & and F. M. Dudley, tor appellant. Dismissed, upon motion ot appellant. OHLMAN et at v. WA'ITERS et al. (Circuit Oourt ot Appeals, Eighth O1reuit. September 18, 1897.) No. 866. In Error to the Circuit Court ot the United States for the District ot South Dakota. A. B. Kittredge, L. B. French, and A. H. OrVis, tor plaintiffs In error. Joe Kirby and. D. B. Sullivan, tor defendants In error. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to stipulation ot parties. PACIFIC CABLE RY. CO. v. BUTrE CITY ST. RY. CO. (Circuit Court ot Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 15, 1894.) No. 112. Appeal from the Circuit Court ot the United States tor the District ot Montana. Wm. F. Booth, tor appellant. Geo. H. Knight, for appellee. Dismissed. .See 68 Fed. 420.

PACIFIC CABLE RY. CO. T. PIEDMONT CABLE CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 10, 1893.) No.. 94. Appeal trom the Circuit Court ot the United States for the Northern District of California. Wm. F. Booth, tor appellant. Wheaton, Kalloch & Klerce, for appellee. Dismissed, on motion otcounsel for appellant, and on consent of counsel for appellee

P. DOUGHERTY CO. T. ALBEMARLE & C. CANAL CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Olrcult. May 6, 1897.) No. 218. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District ot Virginia. Robt. H. Smith and William W. Old, for appellant. William H. White and Robt. N. Hughes, for appellee. Dismissed, on motion of appellant.

PHillNIX STONE CO. v. DUNHAM TOWING &: WRIOOKING 00. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. October 4, 1897.) No.. 459. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. O. E. Kremer, for Phrenlx Stone Co. Dismissed, for failure to docket.

PRESTON T. HUNTER et .al. (Circuit Court ot Appeals, NInth CIrcuit. April 29, 1895.) No. 190. In Error to the Circuit Court ot the United States for the District of Montana. Albert Allen, for plaintiff In error. McConnell, Clayberg & Gunn, tor defendant In error. I\ o. opinion. Reversed, pursuant to decision In PrestQn v. Hunter, 29 U. S. App. 621,15 C. C. A. 148, and 67 Fed. 996.

THE P. S. CHAPPELL. THE P. S. CHAPPELL T. THURSBy.1 (CircuIt Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. November 11, 1897.) No. 280. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland. Thomas Co. Chappell, for appellaDt.B.. W. Mister, tor appellee. Before GOFF and 1ft.. MONTON, Circuit Judges, and PURXELL, District Judge· · Rehearinl deWeQ November 24, 1897.

MEMORANDUM .DECIBIONB.

1005

PER OURIAM. This case In admiralty comes up on appeal trom the district court ot the United States for the district of Maryland. We see no error in the decree of the district court. The same Is affirmed, with costs.

RELIANCE NOVgLTY 00. v. DWORTZEK et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 26, 1897.) No. 387. Appeal from the Circuit Court ot the United States for the Northern District of California. John L. Boone, for appellant. Isaac Frohman, for appellees. Dismissed, pursuant to the twentythird rule, for failure to print record. See 80 Fed. 902.

RISTINE v. AMICONE. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. September 27, 1897.) No. 909. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Lucius M. Cuthbert, for plalntifr In error. F. B. Tiffany, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintifr in error. ROBINSON'S ADM'R v. DETROIT & C. STEAM NAV. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. November 10, 1896.) No. 314. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. John C. Shaw, for appellant. Wells, Angell, Boynton & McMillan, for appellee. Discontinued, by consent, after the reversal of the decree dismissing the libel, and before any rehearing was had under the order of October 5, 1896, granting a rehearing. See 20 C. C. A. 86, 73 Fed. 883.

SABIN v. BARXE'J'T et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 14, 1897.) No. 366. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the District of Washington. Cox, Cotton, Teal & :\lInor, for plaintifr In error. Edward F. Hunter, C. H. Forney, and Charles Richardson, for defendants In error. Dismissed, upon stipulation of parties. See 79 Fed. 947. SECURITY TRUST CO. v. DODD et al. (CirCUit Court of Appeals, Eighth Olrcuit.) No. 91G. Certified to supreme court for instructions upon certain questions, under the provisions of section 6 of the· act of March· S, 1891.

SHIVER:fCK v. R. J. GUNNING CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. September 8, 1897.) No. 853. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. R. S. Hall, for plaintlfr In error. Charles Offutt, for defendant in error. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the twenty-third rule, for failure to print the record, on motion of defendant in error.

SWIFT et al. v. McKENDRY. (Olrcult Court of Appeals, Circuit. October 4, 1897.) No. 930.. In Error to the Clrcult Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. I. R. Andrews, for plaintiffs in error. T. J. Mahoney, for defendant in error. No opinion. Motion of defendant In error to strike bill of exceptions sustained, and judgment affirmed, with costs.

TRUMBUDL v. LOWE. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth 'Circuit. September 14, 1897.) No. 876. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States fot