751
GOURDAIN v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth CircuIt. No. 646. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. R. B. Welch, Henry Keeler, and J. W. Ady, for plaIntiff In error. W. C. Perry, U. S. Atty., for the United States. No opinion. DIsmissed, without costs to either party In thIs court, for want of jurisdiction, on motion of counsel for defendant In error. October 2, 1895.)
HUTCHINSON v. CITY OF HUTCHINSON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 678Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. W. H. Rosslngton and Charles Blood Smith, for appellant. James McKinstry and lj'. F. Prigg, for appellee. No opinion. Reversed, at the costs of appellant, and remanded, with direction to circuit court to remand the cause to the state court at the costs of the party removing same. October 23, 1895.)
JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING CO. v. LEIFHEIT. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 685. In Error to the CircuIt Court of the United States for the Northern District of Iowa. Henry Rickel, for plaintiff In error. Timothy Brown, for defendant In error. No opinion. Dismissed. with costs, for want of jurisdiction, on motion of counsel for defendant In error. October 23, 1895.)
NATIONAL WATER WORKS CO. OF NEW YORK v. KANSAS CITY, MO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 697. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District Df Missouri. 0. O. T1chenor, Gardiner Lathrop, and L. C. Krauthoff, for appellants. H. C. McDougal and Frank Hagerman, for appellee. Reversed, with costs, per stipnlation of parties, and remanded for further lIroceedings. September 2, 1895.)
752
FEDl::itAL REPORTER,
vol. 71.
PARKS v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KAN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 57!. Winfield Freeman, for plaintiff In error. Henry McGrew, George B. Watson, and A.. E. Watson, for defendant In error. Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the twenty-third rule (11 C. C. A. cix., 47 Fed. x.), for failure to print record, on motion of counsel for defendant In error. In Error to tbe Circuit COurt of the United States for the District of Kansas.
::leptember 30, 1895.)
RUST et al. v. FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST CO. et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. No. 717. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District- of Nebraska. , Charles 'Offutt, for appellants. John L. Webster. for appellee A.merican Water Works Co. of Illinois. Dismissed, without costs to appellee, on motion of appellants. January 6, 11>96.)
SACHS et al. v. HUNDLEY. (Circuit Court of A.ppea!s, Eighth Circuit. No. 750. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of COlorado. No opini6n. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule (11 C. C. A.. cvi., 47 Fed. viii.) on motion of counsel for defendant in error. January 23, 1896.)
TAYLOR v. 1-10.
et al. May 16, 1895.)
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
:no.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District '" " Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., E. W. Kittredge, and Smith & Dickinson, for appel" , , ' lant. Henry Crawford, William R. Crawford, Butler, Stillman & Hubbard, and Edward COlston, for appellees. Dismissed by stipulation, each party paying his own costs. , ,
