38 F.3d 610
309 U.S.App.D.C. 35
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Carlos Alberto ORTIZ, Appellant.
No. 93-3085.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 11, 1994.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Before: WALD, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed January 6, 1993 be affirmed. Under the totality of the circumstances, the district court was not clearly erroneous in finding that appellant's consent to the search of his luggage was voluntary. See United States v. Hall, 969 F.2d 1102, 1106 (D.C.Cir.1992) (citations omitted).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.