104 F3d 351 In Re Philip Morris Companies Inc Hamish Maxwell Michael a Miles and William Campbells

104 F.3d 351

In re PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES INC., Hamish Maxwell, Michael
A. Miles and William Campbell, Petitioners.

No. 96-3009.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1996.

Appearing for Petitioner: Herbert M. Wachtell, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, New York.

Appearing for Respondent: Joseph Goldberg, Freedman, Boyd, Daniels, Peifer, Hollander, Guttman & Goldberg, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

E.D.N.Y.

MANDAMUS DENIED.

Before HONORABLE OAKES, WINTER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

1

Petition for a writ of mandamus for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, Judge).

2

This cause came to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was argued.

3

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is hereby denied.

4

Philip Morris Companies Inc., Hamish Maxwell, Michael A. Miles and William Campbell petition for a writ of mandamus to the United States District for the Eastern District of New York, directing Judge Gleeson to withdraw his order granting class certification.

5

We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. The ground for the denial is that there was no clear error committed in certifying the class.

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.